United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
Field Offices

Login

Search

Country Profile
Field Project
Library and Links
News and Events
Contact Information
Crime Commission (CCPCJ)
Commission on Narcotic Drugs (CND)
Global Youth Network
UN News Service Global News Coverage
UN-Wide Calendar
UNODC is cosponsor of the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS - UNAIDS

Sub-Regional Strategy


The United Nations International Drug Control Programme Sub-regional Strategy in the Caribbean is the outright implementation of the Barbados Plan of Action. The Barbados Plan of Action was ratified in Bridgetown, Barbados on 17th May 1996 by 36 member countries

Plan of Action for Drug Control Coordination and Cooperation in the Caribbean

  1. The Regional Meeting on Drug Control Cooperation in the Caribbean considered that one of the main problems facing the Caribbean region was that of illicit drug trafficking from South America to Europe and North America. Caribbean countries formed a geostrategic arc of democracy which was fundamental to the maintenance of peace and security in the western hemisphere. The transit traffic in illicit drugs, however, was undermining and threatening their peace and security. To counter that threat, the Meeting therefore drew up a plan of action incorporating the findings and recommendations emanating from its deliberations.

    A.   NATIONAL DRUG BODIES

  2. To improve the operational capacities, communications capabilities and statutory functions of national drug bodies to pursue more effective coordination of drug control programmes, both domestically and in partnerships with other countries, the following specific measures were prioritized for Governments of the region, which were invited to take action:

    1. To create or strengthen, as appropriate, national drug bodies, and to give these bodies the appropriate authority and independence effectively to pursue their mandate;

    2. To reiterate a clear commitment with a clear mandate to develop and implement national drug-control master plans and strategies;

    3. To provide the organizational structure and to adequately equip the national drug bodies to organize and participate meaningfully in the elaboration, regular review and updating of the national master plan, by producing a single government-approved document that summarizes national drug-control strategy, sets priorities and identifies resources based on realistic estimates, assigns responsibilities, and sets the time for completion;

    4. To guarantee the capacity of national drug bodies to implement projects and activities as defined by the national drug-control master plans and strategies;

    5. To take action to address the weaknesses and needs identified through the regular assessment of the capacity of national drug-control bodies to define, advise on, promote, implement and coordinate the drug-control policy of the Government, and to engage in strategic planning and organizational development for drug control;

    6. To upgrade the communications capabilities of national drug bodies, so that they can communicate more rapidly and more economically with their counterparts in other countries, and share information and data. In this regard the project initiated by the Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission (CICAD) of the Organization of American States (OAS) is acknowledged;

    7. To establish a mechanism for closer regional and international coordination and cooperation and the strengthening of existing structures, for example, the Caribbean Community (CARICOM), OAS, the United Nations International Drug Control Programme (UNDCP), the European Union and other relevant organizations, to facilitate the above-mentioned action.

  3. The mechanism to be established by the European Union, pursuant to the conclusions of the meeting of the European Council, held at Madrid in December 1995, will be a major element in cooperation and coordination efforts.

    B.   LEGISLATION

  4. The Meeting acknowledged the inability of criminal justice systems to deal effectively with major cases of drug trafficking and money-laundering, and recognized the need for such cases to be dealt with expeditiously and effectively.

  5. The Meeting recommended strengthening and working within existing institutions at the regional level to identify key common difficulties and to propose common remedial options for the full consideration of Caribbean attorneys-general and ministers responsible for legal affairs.

  6. The Meeting recognized the problem of insufficiency of legislation dealing with money laundering in several of the jurisdictions of the region and the differences in national legislation. It noted the collaborative efforts to deal with this problem throughout the region under the aegis of the Heads of Government of CARICOM, on the basis of the ministerial communiqué emanating from the Regional Ministerial Meeting on Follow-up to the Naples Political Declaration and Global Action Plan against Organized Transnational Crime*/, held at Buenos Aires from 27 to 30 November 1995, and of the recommendations of the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (CFATF).

  7. * To the extent not already done, States** should take steps to:

    1. Become parties as soon as possible to the relevant international drug control treaties and to implement national legislation to give effect to the provisions thereof;

    2. Review domestic drug-control laws to ensure that they are fundamentally consistent across the subregion and in line with the international drug control conventions. The review should extend to licit drugs, regulatory laws covering the control of production and movement of precursors and essential chemicals, penal codes and codes of criminal procedure, extradition, mutual legal assistance and asset forfeiture legislation;

    3. Ensure that there are adequate investigatory powers in domestic laws to enable effective investigations, prosecution and asset forfeiture in all serious crimes, including drug-related crimes and money-laundering. These include, subject to appropriate safeguards, controlled delivery, undercover operations and telecommunications interception and electronic surveillance;

    4. Make the laundering of the proceeds of all serious crimes a criminal offence in domestic legislation which should, as a minimum, provide for the identification, seizure and forfeiture of the proceeds and instrumentalities of such crimes. Such legislation should comply with the provisions of the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances of 1988,1/ with the recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force established by the Heads of State or Government of the major industrialized countries (Group of Seven) and the President of the Commission of European Communities, and with those of CFATF. The Meeting recognized the responsibility of the CFATF in monitoring and assisting in the implementation of anti-money-laundering measures in the region.

    *       Adopted by the World Ministerial Conference on Organized Transnational Crime, held at Naples, Italy, from 21 to 23 November 1994, and approved by the General Assembly in its resolution 49/159 of 23 December 1994.

    **       For the purposes of the Plan of Action, and unless the context indicates otherwise, references to "States" extend to countries and territories within the Caribbean region for whose foreign relations other countries are responsible, and which may not be States in the sense of international law.

  8. The Meeting noted the existence of the model anti-money laundering legislation prepared respectively by UNDCP, the Commonwealth Secretariat, and CICAD, and commended such model legislation for consideration and adoption by States, as appropriate. The Meeting recommended that such legislation should include provisions regarding the modification of the traditional rules of bank secrecy and the maintenance of adequate bank records to assist in the investigation of money-laundering offences. The provisions of such legislation should extend to bank and non-bank institutions and other entities which can be used for money-laundering.

  9. In recognition of the cross border aspects and implications of money-laundering, the legislation should provide for cooperation between States. More specifically, it should provide for the exchange of information, the use and admissibility of evidence obtained in foreign jurisdictions, asset sharing and extradition.

  10. Where appropriate, bilateral and multilateral agreements should be concluded in order to enhance the effectiveness of legislation.

  11. To implement the legislation the Meeting recommended that assistance in the form of training and other resources should be provided where appropriate.

  12. The Meeting suggested that a timetable should be set for the implementation of the legislation.

  13. States should also take steps:

    1. To move towards harmonization of legislation and sentencing policy, taking account of the different legal and judicial systems in the region;

    2. To revise domestic legislation to facilitate the admissibility of evidence, particularly when obtained from another country, and in relation to evidence obtained by video tape depositions and other electronic means;

    3. To enact legislation necessary to implement maritime cooperation arrangements for law enforcement;

    4. To strengthen the judicial process leading to more successful prosecutions of drug offenders, including increasing the jurisdiction of magistrates and the establishment of a network of regional prosecutors and magistrates, while ensuring the improvement of infrastructure to include improvements to court buildings and adequate court reporting facilities. The Meeting further acknowledged the necessity for the provision of material assistance to States within the region to enhance the capacity of their judicial and prosecutorial systems;

    5. To develop a regional strategy to establish priorities and access to information, training and technical assistance for infra structural improvements which would facilitate the provision of adequate protection and security for witnesses;

    6. To adopt a regional package of treaties based on United Nations or other suitable models on extradition and mutual legal assistance and transfer of prisoners to serve sentences which would be open for signature by other countries on invitation;

    7. To consider the adoption of agreements on the transfer of court proceedings to another jurisdiction, in appropriate cases, in drug-related offences;

    8. To provide assistance throughout the region in the coordination of training at various levels, including court reporting, and training for investigators, prosecutors, magistrates and judges. Such training should continue the University of West Indies (UWI)/UNDCP Legal Training Programme, and be extended to include participants from all Caribbean jurisdictions and training to address money-laundering.

  14. The Meeting acknowledged that conviction for offences related to drug abuse resulted primarily in custodial sentences, and noted the absence of appropriate sentencing alternatives. Consequently, the Meeting recommended the development of programmes geared towards alternative methods of sentencing, such as probation, community service orders, counselling and rehabilitation in accordance with international standards.

    C.   LAW ENFORCEMENT

  15. States should consider strengthening multi-agency collaboration at the national level to maximize the effectiveness of drug law enforcement.

    1.   Exchange of information between Caribbean States

  16. States should consider establishing multi-agency bodies responsible for the coordination, gathering, analysis and dissemination of information and intelligence in order to strengthen this process. In this connection, the respective mandates and responsibilities of the agencies concerned should be carefully defined to ensure a clear delineation of roles;

  17. States should consider establishing a network of national focal points responsible for the exchange of information and intelligence at the regional level, as well as ensuring dissemination of information and intelligence to all relevant agencies at the national level;

  18. States should ensure that national legal frameworks provide for the exchange of information and intelligence within the region;

  19. Where appropriate, States should consider adopting memoranda of understanding at the bilateral and multilateral levels to facilitate and set out the terms and conditions for the exchange of information and intelligence;

  20. While there may be no need for a new regional system for the exchange of information and intelligence, there is a requirement for more effective and secure communications links between Caribbean countries to ensure better regional cooperation;

  21. States should consider the establishment of a communications network linking all the countries of the region quickly, securely and directly through the focal points referred to above so that information can be more closely coordinated internally. In this connection, consideration should be given to using the (SITA-based) telecommunications system of the International Criminal Police Organization (ICPO/Interpol), which can be made accessible to all drug law enforcement agencies concerned;

  22. If necessary, an assessment of the technical requirements for linking existing systems for this purpose should be undertaken, making full use of the expertise of both regional organizations and national authorities;

  23. Law enforcement agencies in the Caribbean region should continue to meet regularly, in order to secure better regional cooperation. In addition, meetings to discuss common policies in law enforcement and other sectors should be held on an ad hoc basis as and when required;

    2.   Training

  24. Greater priority should be given to the provision of training to law enforcement officers in the Caribbean at the national and regional levels;

  25. Regional training institutions such as the Centre interministériel de formation anti-drogues (CIFAD) (Interministerial Drug Control Training Centre) in Martinique, the Constabulary Staff College and the Regional Counter-Narcotics Law Enforcement Training Centre (REDTRAC) in Jamaica and the Police

    Training College in Barbados, have an important role in this respect. In order to ensure that training is properly targeted at priority areas and to avoid duplication, the mandate and role of these institutions should be clearly defined with a view to the closer coordination of their activities and the training which they offer to all the countries of the region.

  26. Training requirements for the region should be reviewed. This review should take into account the training provided by Governments and interregional organizations and the training materials made available by them, as well as utilizing the expertise available within the region.

  27. Countries should undertake an assessment of national law enforcement training needs, which should be updated as necessary in order to assist in the development of an inventory of regional training requirements.

    3.   Interregional cooperation

  28. In order to establish closer links between the Caribbean region and Latin American countries, the states of the Caribbean should consider the establishment of bilateral agreements with Latin American countries on law enforcement matters. Where appropriate, states should consider the creation of Caribbean Drug Liaison Officer posts, or other appropriate measures, to improve coordination.

    4.   Drug law enforcement cooperation in the Caribbean

  29. In addition to continuing work on the harmonization of laws, it is proposed that a comprehensive framework should be developed covering the entire Caribbean region, similar to what is already being done under the Regional Security System (RSS), the Operation Bahamas and Turks and Caicos (OPBAT), and other similar bilateral agreements. Such a framework would give all agencies (police, customs, immigration, coast guard and the military) appropriate means to carry on in the fight against illicit drugs.

  30. Caribbean Governments should consider legal arrangements to establish a mechanism which would coordinate all aspects of drug operations in the Caribbean for which those countries are responsible. It could comprise representatives from the police, customs, immigration, the coast guard and the military. The mechanism could have responsibility for drug interdiction, and in particular could coordinate the work of three subregional coast guards in the north, centre and south of the region.

  31. Provision would also be made for drug interdiction at airports and seaports, drawing on the study recently completed by the Caribbean Customs Law Enforcement Council (CCLEC) at airports in the region.

  32. In order to bring these proposals into being, it is recommended that a team of Caribbean experts, assisted as appropriate by experts from donor agencies, should:

    1. Analyze these concepts and prepare a report for endorsement by regional Heads of Government;

    2. Prepare a list of resources required to ensure that these proposals can be effective.

  33. RSS as a treaty organization, was invited to make proposals with a view to initiating action by December 1996.

    5.   Money-Laundering

  34. States should take action to ratify and implement in full the provisions of the 1988 Convention.

  35. States should continue to support the work of CFATF and to implement the 40 recommendations of FATF and the 19 recommendations of CFATF.

  36. In order to provide urgently needed training and assistance at the regional level, a financial investigation expert team should be established, consisting of specialists from within and outside the region, to assist those in the Caribbean responsible for the investigation of money-laundering.

    6.   Precursors and essential chemicals

  37. Each State should enact legislation to comply fully with the requirements of article 12 of the 1988 Convention. In this respect, the legislation enacted by the Netherlands Antilles appears to be a model appropriate for the Caribbean.

  38. States should seek advice where necessary from the International Narcotics Control Board on precursor chemicals, including their licit and illicit uses in order better to identify suspicious movements.

  39. States should introduce effective control systems for precursor chemicals, including, inter alia, measures to tackle the problem of reinvoicing of cargoes.

  40. States should take advantage of the training available bilaterally, for example through CIFAD in Martinique, and through regional and international organizations.

    7.   Forensic science facilities

  41. Forensic science facilities should be made available to all countries in the Caribbean. This can be effected through the strengthening of existing laboratories in the region and the establishment of drug analytical units in countries where none exists.

  42. Consequently, a comprehensive study, under the auspices of UNDCP, of the forensic support within the region should be undertaken. In addition, there should be continued support of the UNDCP laboratory project within the Caribbean.

  43. In addition, consideration should be given to strengthening regional laboratories in order to ensure that they can provide more sophisticated analysis of controlled substances, where required, for the whole region.

    8.   Witness protection

  44. In order to meet the rising threat to the criminal justice system in countries of the region in the form of intimidation and elimination of witnesses, States should consider the need for domestic reforms to improve the protection of witnesses and the conclusion of agreements which would provide for regional cooperation in the area of witness protection.

    D.   DEMAND REDUCTION

  45. The Meeting reiterated the high priority and importance of primary drug abuse prevention programmes, particularly those directed towards young people, and made the following recommendations:

    1. All efforts in the field of demand reduction should take into account the language and cultural differences that exist in the region;

    2. The overall purpose should be to promote an integrated approach to demand reduction;

    3. The need to reduce both demand and supply should be addressed within the framework of a comprehensive, balanced and integrated strategy;

    4. Demand reduction programmes should include both licit and illicit substances of abuse;

    5. Programme evaluation and follow-up should be a built-in component of all programmes, and the results should be shared at the regional level;

    6. Interregional cooperation in demand reduction should be promoted by sharing, inter alia, information and experiences through electronic and other available information resources.

  46. Timely, comparable and reliable data on substance abuse should be collected nationally and regionally, to ensure appropriate policy and programme development and evaluation. Such data collection should tap into existing sources of data in each country.

  47. States should establish an adequate institutional infrastructure at the national and regional levels, including training and necessary technology, for the collection, analysis and dissemination of epidemiological information.

  48. A Caribbean-wide drug epidemiological surveillance system should be established in cooperation with regional organizations and agencies to support:

    1. The formation of research teams in each country, trained in epidemiology research methods and data analysis, leading to the dissemination of research findings;

    2. The consolidation of existing data on substance abuse, and the refinement of existing instruments and methods to ensure comparability;

    3. The provision of computer hardware and software for data analysis to national drug commissions and the integration of the data-processing function into related national information systems;

    4. The conduct of surveys including rapid assessment studies and studies of knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) and other surveys as deemed appropriate in the participating countries.

  49. A mechanism should be established to facilitate the exchange of information at the national and regional level.

  50. The Meeting emphasized the need for drug education to take place in the context of a skills-based approach to health and family life education in Caribbean schools, endorsed the inter-agency Health and Family Life Education project in the CARICOM States, and encouraged the development of similar programmes in non-CARICOM states. It recommended special attention to critical target groups in formal and non-formal educational settings, such as out-of-school youth, and the training of teachers, guidance counsellors, school administrators and policy makers.

  51. States should initiate and enhance activities at the national and regional levels to mobilize employers and workers’ organizations to address substance abuse in the workplace through the development of employee assistance and similar programmes, and to strengthen partnerships between the business community and Government in addressing drug problems.

  52. States should expand public awareness through working partnerships with the media, ensure that messages are culturally appropriate, and conduct training of trainers in communications techniques on a regional basis as a cost-effective manner of promoting local training and local anti-drug awareness messages.

  53. States should establish a training network based on existing structures and operations, such as the Caribbean Institute on Alcoholism and other Drugs (CARIAD), CICAD, and UWI, as well as a fellowship programme which includes on-the-job training, internships and study visits.

  54. States should explore, on a regional basis, ways to develop in-prison programmes, including after-care/after-release programmes and possibilities of implementing alternative sentencing.

  55. States should strengthen the development of treatment and rehabilitation programs, especially out-patient programs, including social reintegration, through exchanges of experience and regional training efforts, paying particular attention to support groups and to the special needs of women and youth. A regional assessment and evaluation of the efficacy of different treatment modalities should be undertaken.

    E.   MARITIME COOPERATION

  56. The Meeting recognized that in the area of maritime drug-trafficking interdiction, successful mechanisms, initiatives and working cooperation between States of the region as well as between these States and States outside the region already exist.

  57. RSS was requested to develop a plan for a framework to oversee all the maritime aspects of drug operations in the Caribbean with respect to the development of subregional coast guards.

  58. RSS was also requested to continue the development of a subregional framework for its member States.

  59. The numerous bilateral cooperation agreements should be consolidated into a regional agreement that would include all Caribbean States, as well as France, Netherlands, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America.

  60. A system to maximize and coordinate all maritime and aerial resources available in the Caribbean should be developed. The establishment of subregional coast guards should be continued.

  61. States should examine the efficiency of the registry of ships and their capacity to verify registry. If needed, assistance should be sought to improve the registry to enable the State to respond quickly. States in the region should consider the recommendations of the Working Group on Maritime Cooperation, as endorsed by the Commission on Narcotic Drugs, in implementing article 17 (Illicit traffic by sea) of the 1988 Convention and in extending their cooperation to counter illicit traffic by sea.

  62. States should also introduce more effective controls in monitoring the movement of vessels, particularly small vessels and pleasure craft, through the introduction of standard regional enforcement systems that build on existing customs clearance documents for arriving and departing vessels. This information should be used to develop intelligence that can drive and direct the enforcement efforts of all law enforcement agencies in the region. The work already being done by CCLEC to develop these regional systems should be consolidated and further enhanced.

  63. To maximize scarce training resources, States that provide maritime interdiction and coast guard training should be encouraged to share their training schedules with UNDCP. UNDCP should continue its efforts to consolidate model training guides on boarding and searching vessels suspected of containing illicit drugs. As law enforcement agencies are being required to work together more and more frequently, regional and subregional training programmes should be developed.

  64. Efforts should be made by all Governments of the region to institute cooperation between customs administrations, the shipping industry and port authorities to suppress drug trafficking through the signing of memoranda of understanding. Assistance in this regard could be provided by the International Maritime Organization, building on the programme of memoranda of understanding of the World Customs Organization (WCO) and the work being done by CCLEC in the region.

  65. Insufficient control over cargo entering and leaving free ports and free trade zones is a problem not only of the Caribbean region but worldwide. Measures to suppress illicit drug trafficking in those zones should not be less stringent than those applied in other parts of a country's territory in accordance with the 1988 United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, article 18 (Free trade zones and free ports) and with the International Convention on the Simplification and Harmonization of Customs Procedures of 1973, adopted at Kyoto, Japan, annex F, regarding customs procedures.

  66. Consideration should be given to mobilizing the community to report suspicious vessels through awareness-creation campaigns.

    F.   GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS

  67. Organizations involved in improving regional coordination and cooperation in combating the drug problem should be strengthened.

  68. It would be desirable to convene an annual meeting at a high level to ensure the follow-up and implementation of the Plan of Action.



back to top